Menu
Missouri's distracted driving laws now reach far beyond simply sending a text behind the wheel. Drivers can face traffic consequences for prohibited cell phone and electronic device use, and the stakes can become much more serious when alleged distraction contributes to a crash involving injury or death.
Springfield distracted driving attorney Steven F. Groce has practiced law since 1984 and represents drivers facing traffic and criminal allegations in Springfield, Greene County, and throughout Southwest Missouri. His more than four decades of legal experience include extensive work involving driving-related offenses and law enforcement traffic stops.
A texting and driving allegation may involve questions about what the driver was actually doing with the device, whether the vehicle was moving or lawfully stopped, what an officer observed, and whether an exception to Missouri's hands-free law applies.
Steven works directly with clients who need to understand the charge, potential consequences, and legal options available. Whether the allegation involves texting, holding a phone, another prohibited use of an electronic device, or a distracted driving accident, the specific facts matter.
Missouri's Siddens Bening Hands Free Law restricts several forms of electronic device use while operating a vehicle. Although many drivers still think of these rules primarily as a ban on texting and driving, the law applies much more broadly.
In general, drivers may face a violation for prohibited conduct involving an electronic communication device, including:
The law applies to more than traditional cell phones. Depending on the device and how it is being used, tablets, portable computers, messaging devices, and other electronic communication technology may also fall within the law.
Missouri also recognizes several exceptions. Certain hands-free and voice-operated functions are permitted, and drivers may generally use electronic devices for purposes such as navigation or audio without violating the law when the use falls within the statutory requirements. Emergency communications can also receive different treatment.
Use while a vehicle is lawfully stopped or parked is another important distinction. The facts surrounding whether a vehicle was actually being operated can therefore matter when a driver is accused of prohibited electronic device use.
For someone facing a texting and driving citation in Springfield, the issue is not simply whether a phone was somewhere inside the vehicle. The alleged activity, how the device was being used, and the circumstances surrounding the driving can all affect whether the conduct falls within Missouri's distracted driving law.
Missouri's hands-free law contains an important limitation on traffic enforcement. A driver generally cannot be stopped, inspected, or detained solely because an officer believes the person violated the electronic device restrictions.
That does not mean distracted driving violations cannot be enforced. It means the circumstances surrounding the law enforcement encounter matter.
For example, an officer may have another lawful reason for initiating a traffic stop and then claim to observe or develop evidence of prohibited cell phone use. A distracted driving allegation may also arise after a collision or another incident that brings law enforcement into contact with the driver.
Potential questions may include:
Missouri law also provides that a distracted driving violation by itself does not establish probable cause for another violation. That distinction can become important when evaluating how an encounter developed and what evidence law enforcement subsequently obtained.
A Springfield texting and driving attorney can help a driver understand how Missouri's enforcement rules apply to the particular circumstances of the citation. The fact that an officer alleges prohibited phone use does not eliminate questions about why the stop occurred or whether the evidence supports the violation.
A distracted driving violation may begin as a traffic matter, but the potential consequences depend on the driver's history and the circumstances surrounding the alleged offense. Repeat violations and cases involving collisions can carry greater consequences than a basic first offense.
Missouri's hands-free law provides escalating penalties for repeat violations. The consequences can also become substantially more serious when prohibited electronic device use allegedly contributes to an accident involving another person.
Depending on the circumstances, a distracted driving case may involve:
The specific allegation matters. A driver accused of holding a phone during an otherwise routine traffic encounter is in a very different position from someone accused of prohibited device use immediately before a serious collision.
Drivers should also avoid assuming that a distracted driving citation is automatically insignificant because it does not involve DWI or another more familiar criminal traffic offense. Traffic convictions can have consequences beyond the immediate financial penalty, particularly for drivers with an existing traffic history or those whose employment depends on driving.
When an accident is involved, the circumstances can become even more important. Evidence concerning what the driver was allegedly doing, when the electronic device was used, and whether that activity contributed to the collision may affect the seriousness of the case.
Steven F. Groce represents Springfield drivers facing traffic and criminal allegations. With more than 40 years of legal experience, he can help clients understand what they have been charged with and the potential consequences associated with the specific distracted driving allegation.
Distracted driving allegations take on greater significance when they arise from a collision. In these cases, the legal questions may extend beyond whether a driver improperly held or used a phone. Law enforcement may also investigate whether the alleged distraction contributed to the crash and resulting harm.
A serious distracted driving case may involve allegations concerning:
The existence of a cell phone in the vehicle does not by itself establish that prohibited device use caused a collision. Timing can matter. So can witness accounts, video evidence, the physical circumstances of the crash, statements made by those involved, and legally obtained information concerning device use.
It is also important to distinguish the traffic or criminal case from potential civil liability. A collision may lead to an insurance claim or civil lawsuit while law enforcement separately investigates whether the driver violated Missouri law. Those proceedings involve different legal issues and potential consequences.
When injury or death is alleged, a Springfield distracted driving case deserves particularly careful attention. The government may seek to connect electronic device use to the driver's conduct and the resulting collision, making the evidence concerning causation especially important.
Steven's role as a traffic and criminal defense attorney is to represent people facing allegations arising from the incident. No attorney can ethically guarantee a particular outcome, but defendants have the right to understand the evidence against them and contest allegations the government must prove.
Distracted driving allegations can depend heavily on what law enforcement claims the driver was doing with an electronic device at a particular moment. Unlike some traffic violations that may be established primarily through an officer's observation of a vehicle, a texting and driving case can raise additional questions about the device itself and how it was being used.
Evidence that may become relevant includes:
The distinction between holding a phone and using permitted hands-free functionality can matter. So can the difference between prohibited activity and a use that falls within an exception to Missouri law.
Electronic device privacy can also become an important issue. Missouri's hands-free law includes protections concerning searches of devices in connection with enforcement. Under the statute, when an officer stops a noncommercial vehicle in circumstances involving the hands-free law, the driver must be informed of the right to decline a search of the electronic communication device. The law also places limits on obtaining a search warrant based solely on an alleged hands-free violation, subject to circumstances involving serious injury or death.
Those protections do not mean that phone-related evidence can never be obtained or used. The circumstances of the investigation, legal basis for obtaining the evidence, and seriousness of the underlying incident can all matter.
A Springfield texting and driving attorney can evaluate the evidence involved and determine which legal or factual issues are relevant to the particular allegation rather than assuming that every distracted driving case turns on the same proof.
A distracted driving citation does not necessarily establish that a driver violated Missouri law. The circumstances of the traffic encounter, what the officer observed, how the electronic device was allegedly being used, and whether an exception applies can all affect the case.
Depending on the circumstances, legal and factual issues may include:
These issues do not automatically provide a defense simply because they are present. Their significance depends on the facts of the individual case and the evidence available.
For example, an officer seeing a driver interact with an electronic device does not necessarily establish precisely what function was being used. Similarly, the presence of electronic activity around the time of an accident does not by itself answer every question concerning what caused the collision.
A Springfield distracted driving attorney can evaluate which issues actually matter based on the specific allegation. Steven F. Groce brings more than four decades of legal experience to representing drivers facing traffic and criminal allegations in Springfield and throughout Southwest Missouri.
For commercial drivers, a distracted driving allegation can create concerns beyond the immediate citation. Driving is often the foundation of a commercial driver's livelihood, making traffic violations that could affect commercial driving privileges especially important.
Missouri's hands-free restrictions apply to commercial vehicle operation, and violations can carry additional implications for CDL holders. Under Missouri law, a violation of the hands-free requirements while operating a commercial motor vehicle can qualify as a serious traffic violation for purposes of commercial driver's license disqualification.
That means a commercial driver should not automatically treat a texting or electronic-device citation as a routine ticket without considering the possible effect on a CDL and employment.
Relevant circumstances can include:
Commercial drivers may also encounter electronic equipment as part of their work. The existence of a phone, navigation system, or other technology in a commercial vehicle does not by itself establish prohibited distracted driving. The manner in which the device was allegedly being used remains important.
Steven represents drivers facing traffic-related allegations in Springfield and Southwest Missouri. For CDL holders, understanding the potential consequences before deciding how to respond to a citation can be particularly important when the ability to drive professionally is at stake.
A distracted driving allegation can range from a traffic citation to a much more serious matter involving an accident, injury, or commercial driver's license. Steven F. Groce has practiced law since 1984 and brings more than 40 years of legal experience to people facing driving-related allegations in Springfield and throughout Southwest Missouri.
Steven's longstanding criminal and DWI practice has also given him extensive experience with cases arising from traffic stops and law enforcement encounters involving drivers.
Clients seeking representation for a Springfield texting or distracted driving matter can turn to Steven for:
No attorney can ethically guarantee that a distracted driving citation will be dismissed or that a particular outcome will be achieved. The appropriate response depends on what happened, the evidence involved, and the consequences the driver may be facing.
Steven provides experienced, direct representation for Springfield drivers who want to understand those issues before deciding how to address a distracted driving allegation.
Is texting while driving illegal in Missouri?
Yes. Missouri's hands-free law prohibits drivers from using electronic communication devices for activities that include manually reading, writing, or sending text-based communications while operating a vehicle. The law extends beyond traditional SMS text messages and can apply to email, social media, and other forms of electronic communication.
Missouri's restrictions are also broader than texting alone. Depending on the circumstances, physically holding or supporting a phone, manually entering information, watching video, or engaging in other prohibited electronic device activity can result in a violation.
Hands-free and certain other permitted uses are treated differently, so the specific way the device was being used matters.
Can I hold my phone while stopped at a red light?
Missouri law includes an exception for electronic device use while a vehicle is lawfully stopped or parked. Whether particular conduct falls within that exception depends on the circumstances, so drivers should be careful about assuming that every temporary interruption in traffic permits otherwise prohibited device use.
The broader hands-free law generally restricts physically holding or supporting a covered electronic communication device while operating a vehicle. If a citation arises from phone use while a vehicle was stopped, the precise circumstances surrounding the alleged violation can therefore be important.
Can police search my phone after a texting and driving stop?
A texting or distracted driving allegation does not automatically give law enforcement unrestricted authority to search a driver's electronic device.
Missouri's hands-free law contains specific protections concerning device searches. In circumstances covered by the statute involving a noncommercial vehicle, drivers must be informed of their right to decline a search of the electronic communication device. The law also limits search warrants based solely on an alleged hands-free violation, although different considerations can apply in cases involving serious physical injury or death.
Whether electronic evidence was lawfully obtained depends on the circumstances of the individual investigation.
Can a distracted driving charge become more serious after an accident?
Yes. The consequences can increase substantially when prohibited electronic device use is alleged to have contributed to a collision, particularly when another person suffers physical injury, serious physical injury, or death.
These cases can involve more than determining whether a driver used a phone. Evidence may also be used in an effort to establish when the device was used, what the driver was doing, and whether the alleged distraction contributed to the collision.
An accident may also create separate insurance or civil liability issues. Steven's representation focuses on defending clients facing traffic and criminal allegations arising from the incident.
A texting and driving citation can be more significant than it initially appears. Missouri's hands-free law regulates a broad range of electronic device use, and the consequences can become considerably more serious when an allegation involves a repeat violation, commercial driver, collision, serious injury, or death.
Steven F. Groce, Attorney at Law has practiced law since 1984 and represents drivers facing traffic and criminal allegations in Springfield, Greene County, and throughout Southwest Missouri. With more than four decades of legal experience, Steven provides direct representation to clients who need to understand the charge, evidence, and potential consequences they face.
Contact Steven F. Groce, Attorney at Law to discuss your situation with an experienced Springfield distracted driving attorney. Whether you are accused of texting while driving, unlawfully holding or using a phone, or distracted driving connected to a serious accident, Steven can help you understand the allegation and the legal options available based on the circumstances of your case.
